Re: Are the ELF transmitters based on a mistranslation?
Verfasst: Samstag 16. März 2013, 00:19
the way I see it is the same design as Wireless Broadband networking. You have a core running a high datarate and the from each attached node, you have a group of base-stations providing coverage for the local area. Even with this tech. there are still "dead" spots and limitations.
normally you'd run your core with a solid connections, say fiber 100mb/s per node, and then 56mb/s per base-station and each repeater off each base-station, and then each endpoint connection at say 1mb/s upto 11mb/s (depending on the use). this is possible and currently in use. you may think 1mb/s is low, but when you have that running at @ 11ms ping and a lat of 45 it's a lot better than an DSL2+ connection, we run over the 1mb/s end-point connections IP-phones, data and video with next to no lose of quality, while a 20mb/s DSL connection can still have packet drops and time-outs if there are others connection to the same D-SLAM.
We know that EnTrOx has trans-ocean datalines running all over the place (we've all played the missions where you have to protect one of the comm's stations). and they have these comm's stations to provide local connections.
if you want to get real-world on comm's, remember the US has satelite to sub comm's that can penerate 100m plus of sea. there is also the green-laser direct communation system.
key thing to remember is they wouldn't be using normal anolog connections, it'd be digital with a very high compression. which means you can have large amounts of data going over the same lines as what 10 anolog connections would use, and that data would include voice/video/data. and it'd be better than our current tech.
normally you'd run your core with a solid connections, say fiber 100mb/s per node, and then 56mb/s per base-station and each repeater off each base-station, and then each endpoint connection at say 1mb/s upto 11mb/s (depending on the use). this is possible and currently in use. you may think 1mb/s is low, but when you have that running at @ 11ms ping and a lat of 45 it's a lot better than an DSL2+ connection, we run over the 1mb/s end-point connections IP-phones, data and video with next to no lose of quality, while a 20mb/s DSL connection can still have packet drops and time-outs if there are others connection to the same D-SLAM.
We know that EnTrOx has trans-ocean datalines running all over the place (we've all played the missions where you have to protect one of the comm's stations). and they have these comm's stations to provide local connections.
if you want to get real-world on comm's, remember the US has satelite to sub comm's that can penerate 100m plus of sea. there is also the green-laser direct communation system.
key thing to remember is they wouldn't be using normal anolog connections, it'd be digital with a very high compression. which means you can have large amounts of data going over the same lines as what 10 anolog connections would use, and that data would include voice/video/data. and it'd be better than our current tech.